Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
I wanted to try TinyBase with Solid. This introduces a set of brindings that closely mirror the react bindings.
This very large changeset was generated entirely by codex with minor guidance.
Published a release candidate to https://www.npmjs.com/package/@djgrant/tinybase/v/7.3.6-rc.1.
How did you test this change?
I have used these bindings in a side project. I am completely new to tinybase so would likely miss any nuanced behavioural issues.
I had a quick look at the demo harness. I guess some thought would need to go into support a React/Solid switcher for the benefit of both docs and e2e tests.