You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Observed that:
if bootnode_addresses are set with with_bootnodes_addresses() there are no address replacements (introduced here)
eg. {{ZOMBIE:alice:multiAddress}} is not translated into proper address
Similar replacements are performed for args
bootnodes_addresses set for ParachainConfigBuilder are not taken into account eventually.
In add_parachain() method we set bootnodes_addr = &vec![] (see this), despite input para_config could hold some values.
Describe the solution you'd like
Implement replacements
There is an option to set bootnodes_addresses at node/collator level so maybe it would make sense to get rid of with_bootnodes_addresses() for ParachainConfigBuilder?
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Observed that:
if
bootnode_addressesare set withwith_bootnodes_addresses()there are no address replacements (introduced here)eg.
{{ZOMBIE:alice:multiAddress}}is not translated into proper addressSimilar replacements are performed for
argsbootnodes_addressesset for ParachainConfigBuilder are not taken into account eventually.In add_parachain() method we set bootnodes_addr = &vec![] (see this), despite input para_config could hold some values.
Describe the solution you'd like
bootnodes_addressesatnode/collatorlevel so maybe it would make sense to get rid ofwith_bootnodes_addresses()forParachainConfigBuilder?Describe alternatives you've considered
No response
Additional context
No response